
bio.tools
Specialised registry assigning persistent identifiers to research software and services for discovery and reuse.
Show details
Currently captures credit for
- Research Software Code Repository (Software)
- Software Package (Software)
Credit-capture infrastructure
The platforms that turn output-level effort into machine-readable, citable credit — from persistent identifiers to granular contribution tracking to aggregated researcher profiles.
How the layers fit together
Essential infrastructure sits at both ends: one platform gives an output its first persistent, citable identity, another surfaces that identity as part of a researcher's formal academic profile. Everything between them is intermediary — the services that merge, enrich, track and standardise the record on its way across.
Essential
The baseline layer without which non-traditional outputs cannot be credited at all: platforms that give an output its first persistent, discoverable identity, and systems that surface that identity as part of a researcher's formal academic profile.
These platforms provide the initial repository registration for NTOs and assign the unique persistent identifiers (PIDs) necessary for their discovery, metadata hosting, and subsequent citation.

Specialised registry assigning persistent identifiers to research software and services for discovery and reuse.

Web-based tool for authoring, sharing, and publishing Data Management Plans against funder-specific templates, giving the DMP itself a hosted, citable record.

ELIXIR-recommended portfolio of trustworthy public deposition databases for biomolecular data, giving submitted datasets a discoverable, FAIR-compliant home with standardised metadata.

Platform for discovering and registering life-science training materials and events.

Curated registry of data and metadata standards, databases, and repositories, giving each a discoverable, citable record independent of where the underlying data is hosted.
Version-controlled code hosting; the primary home for research software repositories prior to archival/PID assignment.
Open-source, journal-independent platform for publishing community reviews of preprints, giving each review a citable, publicly discoverable record tied to the reviewer's ORCID.

Archives public source code at scale and assigns permanent SWHIDs (an ISO/IEC-standardised identifier scheme), preserving research software even after its original hosting location disappears.

Registry for computational workflows, providing citable, versioned identifiers.
General-purpose repository issuing DOIs for datasets, software releases, training materials, and reports.
These systems aggregate data from primary NTO repositories, enriched metadata services, and active tracking platforms to comprehensively host and represent PID-associated NTOs — translating granular research activity into meaningful, human-readable profiles suitable for formal academic assessment.

Aggregates credit-relevant data into metadata-rich, human-readable researcher profiles tailored to discipline/contribution type.
Profiles are generated automatically from OpenAIRE Graph data for any researcher with a discoverable output record — no registration or manual curation required, but coverage is limited to what's already indexed upstream.
Persistent researcher identifier used to link contributions of any kind back to an individual across systems.
Free for researchers to register and keep for life; once linked, it works passively — connected publishers, funders, and repositories push updates to the profile automatically without further manual entry.
Intermediary
The layer that sits between raw publishing and the researcher's profile: aggregating records to avoid double-counting, enriching them with quality context, tracking granular ongoing labour, and providing the shared vocabularies that let all of the above interoperate.
Aggregation services merge PID-assigned NTO metadata from diverse repositories into a unified, searchable knowledge graph — essential for deduplicating records to prevent double-counting across platforms, so that clean, verified data feeds into academic profiling systems.

Merges PID-assigned research output information from diverse sources into a single, searchable knowledge graph.
Free and openly queryable via API or bulk dataset download; nothing to register. Coverage depends entirely on upstream infrastructure, though — a record only appears once its source repository already exposes a compatible PID and metadata.
These services enrich basic NTO metadata by appending missing annotations, such as specific topics or technical performance indicators — contextual enrichment that is crucial for establishing the qualitative value of NTOs and helping to prevent a quantity-over-quality assessment model.

Adds impact-related annotations (e.g. topics, influence indicators) to research outputs.
Free API and bulk downloads keyed by DOI, usable by any service that can look up a DOI — no account needed. Indicators are only computed for outputs that already have a DOI and an established citation trail.
Metadata commons that unifies tool identifiers across eight software registries and cross-checks their records against each other, surfacing gaps and conflicts so a tool's description stays consistent and citable wherever it is found.
Free and open, with all metadata version-controlled and reusable; no registration is needed to consume it. A tool only benefits if it is already described in one of the upstream registries RSEc imports from, so the practical step is getting it into bio.tools, Bioconda, Bioconductor, BioContainers, Debian Med, Galaxy Codex, OpenEBench or WorkflowHub first.

Adds software quality and benchmarking performance indicators to research software entries.
Free to use, but enrichment isn't automatic on sign-up: a tool needs to be registered in bio.tools and its maintainers need to opt it into a benchmarking community/challenge before performance indicators appear.
Active tracking platforms capture granular NTO contributions at scale through dynamic recognition models — essential for recording vital, ongoing research labour (e.g. curation) that holds significant aggregate value but remains entirely invisible within publications.

Captures granular biocuration and annotation events using a dynamic model of entity, activity, agent, and timeline, with badges/leaderboards for visibility. Resources can also register new curation activities directly on the platform, giving it a registration role alongside its tracking function.
Free and open source, but not self-service for end users: a database has to implement APICURON's reporting API to log its curation events before any of its individual curators can be credited, so it requires integration work on the data provider's side first.
Structured ontologies and controlled vocabularies are the semantic layer everything else here depends on: they fix what a research activity or output is called, so a contribution recorded on one platform means the same thing on another. The vocabularies in production today are activity-centric — CRediT standardises the contributor roles behind an output rather than the output itself. The gap is output-centric: no widely adopted or established ontology for non-traditional outputs currently exists, leaving NTO types described inconsistently from platform to platform.

NISO-standardised taxonomy of contributor roles providing the shared, machine-readable vocabulary that lets credit-capture platforms describe contributions consistently.
Free, open taxonomy — not a platform to register with. It only takes effect where a journal or submission system has integrated it into its workflow, so applicability depends on adoption upstream, not on the individual contributor.
External cross-walk
The same 18 platforms grouped by the four-tier reference architecture from the CoARA working group on Open Infrastructures for Responsible Research Assessment. This is a supplementary lens, not a replacement: each card keeps an outlined badge naming the Essential or Intermediary group it belongs to here, and each tier below names the groups its members came from. The two models deliberately disagree — CoARA's Tier 3 gathers services this registry files under three separate headings — and that divergence is the point of showing both.
Essential metadata, ensuring consistent tracking with Persistent Identifiers (PIDs), and adopting standardised protocols.
Our grouping: Ontologies & Controlled Vocabularies (Intermediary) · Academic Profiles & Representation (Essential)

NISO-standardised taxonomy of contributor roles providing the shared, machine-readable vocabulary that lets credit-capture platforms describe contributions consistently.
Free, open taxonomy — not a platform to register with. It only takes effect where a journal or submission system has integrated it into its workflow, so applicability depends on adoption upstream, not on the individual contributor.
Persistent researcher identifier used to link contributions of any kind back to an individual across systems.
Free for researchers to register and keep for life; once linked, it works passively — connected publishers, funders, and repositories push updates to the profile automatically without further manual entry.
Repositories, open access journals and publishers where the public is accessing the research products like articles, data, software, and many others.
Our grouping: Publishing & Persistent Identifier Provision (Essential)

Specialised registry assigning persistent identifiers to research software and services for discovery and reuse.

Web-based tool for authoring, sharing, and publishing Data Management Plans against funder-specific templates, giving the DMP itself a hosted, citable record.

ELIXIR-recommended portfolio of trustworthy public deposition databases for biomolecular data, giving submitted datasets a discoverable, FAIR-compliant home with standardised metadata.

Platform for discovering and registering life-science training materials and events.

Curated registry of data and metadata standards, databases, and repositories, giving each a discoverable, citable record independent of where the underlying data is hosted.
Version-controlled code hosting; the primary home for research software repositories prior to archival/PID assignment.
Open-source, journal-independent platform for publishing community reviews of preprints, giving each review a citable, publicly discoverable record tied to the reviewer's ORCID.

Archives public source code at scale and assigns permanent SWHIDs (an ISO/IEC-standardised identifier scheme), preserving research software even after its original hosting location disappears.

Registry for computational workflows, providing citable, versioned identifiers.
General-purpose repository issuing DOIs for datasets, software releases, training materials, and reports.
Database aggregators or Scientific Knowledge Graph that contains the metadata in tiers 0 and 1.
Our grouping: Metadata Enrichment & Quality Context (Intermediary) · Aggregation & Deduplication (Intermediary)
Metadata commons that unifies tool identifiers across eight software registries and cross-checks their records against each other, surfacing gaps and conflicts so a tool's description stays consistent and citable wherever it is found.
Free and open, with all metadata version-controlled and reusable; no registration is needed to consume it. A tool only benefits if it is already described in one of the upstream registries RSEc imports from, so the practical step is getting it into bio.tools, Bioconda, Bioconductor, BioContainers, Debian Med, Galaxy Codex, OpenEBench or WorkflowHub first.

Merges PID-assigned research output information from diverse sources into a single, searchable knowledge graph.
Free and openly queryable via API or bulk dataset download; nothing to register. Coverage depends entirely on upstream infrastructure, though — a record only appears once its source repository already exposes a compatible PID and metadata.
Services and platforms that are leveraging the previous tiers in order to generate metrics, analytics and indicators tailored for RRA.
Our grouping: Active Contribution Tracking (Intermediary) · Metadata Enrichment & Quality Context (Intermediary) · Academic Profiles & Representation (Essential)

Captures granular biocuration and annotation events using a dynamic model of entity, activity, agent, and timeline, with badges/leaderboards for visibility. Resources can also register new curation activities directly on the platform, giving it a registration role alongside its tracking function.
Free and open source, but not self-service for end users: a database has to implement APICURON's reporting API to log its curation events before any of its individual curators can be credited, so it requires integration work on the data provider's side first.

Adds impact-related annotations (e.g. topics, influence indicators) to research outputs.
Free API and bulk downloads keyed by DOI, usable by any service that can look up a DOI — no account needed. Indicators are only computed for outputs that already have a DOI and an established citation trail.

Aggregates credit-relevant data into metadata-rich, human-readable researcher profiles tailored to discipline/contribution type.
Profiles are generated automatically from OpenAIRE Graph data for any researcher with a discoverable output record — no registration or manual curation required, but coverage is limited to what's already indexed upstream.

Adds software quality and benchmarking performance indicators to research software entries.
Free to use, but enrichment isn't automatic on sign-up: a tool needs to be registered in bio.tools and its maintainers need to opt it into a benchmarking community/challenge before performance indicators appear.
Persistent researcher identifier used to link contributions of any kind back to an individual across systems.
Free for researchers to register and keep for life; once linked, it works passively — connected publishers, funders, and repositories push updates to the profile automatically without further manual entry.
Propose a platform that captures credit for a non-traditional output type, under the relevant category, or suggest a correction to an existing entry.
Submit new infrastructure